XENLOOK C2PAتحقق
Course contents
Chapter 9 of 10

Chapter 9Getting onto the international official list

In this chapter you find out what it takes to get onto the international official trust list (the C2PA Trust List) and compare it with where this site is now. Then you give a short presentation of your practice results so far.

  • Official session name · Reviewing international certification requirements and final demonstration
  • 5 practice steps
  • You can follow along without signing in
What you will learn in this chapter
  • You can name the main kinds of requirement for getting onto the official list.
  • You can check this site's current stage from its public material.
  • You give a short presentation of your practice results and get feedback.

The idea in plain words

Like a local contest and national team selection
Winning a local contest does not put you on the national team; you still have to pass the set selection criteria. This site really runs, but to get onto the international list it has to meet the set criteria and pass a review.

The C2PA Trust List is the list of certificate authorities that verifiers have “agreed to trust.” Only when an authority is on it do other companies' verifiers show its files as “trusted.”

Broadly, getting onto the list takes: following the set certificate policy, protecting the secret keys in a dedicated security device, running issuance and revocation lookups steadily, operating openly and being audited, and passing the conformance tests.

The detailed requirements follow the latest documents C2PA publishes. They can change, so write down the document name and the date you looked.

This site is currently a pilot and is not yet on the Trust List. You can check its current state yourself in the public repository, the transparency dashboard and the limits page.

Putting the requirements next to the current state shows what still needs doing. This comparison becomes material for your improvement report in chapter 10.

See the picture

  1. Learn the requirementsC2PA public documents
  2. Check the current statethis site's public material
  3. Comparerequirement · state · gap
  4. Presentmentor feedback
Compare the requirements you researched with the public material to find the gaps, then sum it up in a presentation.

Try it yourself

Work from the top, one step at a time. After each step, check that your screen matches “What you should see.”
  1. On the about page, find how this site describes its own stage.
    What you should see You see the phrase “Korea pilot CA — C2PA Trust List review in progress.”
  2. On the operations transparency dashboard, list what it makes public.
    What you should see You see the title “Operational Transparency Dashboard” and the items it publishes.
  3. In the public repository and on the limits page, find the certificate policy, the revocation lookups and the note that the site is not listed.
    What you should see You found the policy documents, the CRL and OCSP information and the “not on the Trust List” explanation.
  4. Make a comparison table. The columns are requirement, current state, evidence page and gap. Where you found no evidence, write “not found in public material.”
    What you should see Each requirement has its current state and an evidence page.
    No sign-in
  5. Give a short presentation of your chapter 1–9 practice results. Be sure to include the one result that surprised you most, the one most important limit, and one suggestion.
    What you should see You wrote your mentor's feedback on your record sheet.
    With your mentor
The part you do with your mentor · The mentor listens to your presentation and gives feedback. For cells left as “not found in public material,” ask the mentor about the real situation, but put only what can be made public into your report.

Check your work

If you can answer “yes” to everything below, you have finished this chapter.
  • Can you say in one sentence why getting onto the Trust List matters?
  • Did you check this site's current stage from its public material?
  • Did you fill in the comparison table with evidence pages?

Easy to mix up

  • Common misunderstandingA site that really runs must be officially certified.
    What is actually trueBeing in operation and being on the official list are different. This site is a pilot in operation, and it is not listed.
  • Common misunderstandingOnce you have looked up the requirements, you can keep using them as they are.
    What is actually trueThe requirements can change. Always write down the date you looked and the document name.

Review questions

  1. Question 1What changes once an authority is on the Trust List?Show answerHide answer
    Other companies' verifiers also show the files it signed as “trusted.”
  2. Question 2Name two requirements for getting onto the official list.Show answerHide answer
    Any two of: following the set certificate policy, protecting the secret keys in a dedicated security device, running revocation lookups, operating openly and being audited, and passing the conformance tests.
  3. Question 3How should you fill in a cell where you found no evidence?Show answerHide answer
    Write “not found in public material.” Do not fill it with a guess.

Key terms

C2PA Trust List
The official list of certificate authorities that C2PA verifiers have agreed to trust.
Certificate policy
The rule document that sets how certificates are issued and managed.
Conformance
A test of whether something follows the standard correctly.
Transparency
Publishing how a service is run so that outsiders can check it.

Practice log

Print it and write by hand, or copy the same items into a document. Once your mentor has checked it, you are done.
Chapter 9 practice logGetting onto the international official list
Practice date
Written by
Mentor check
  1. The official list requirements you researched (document name, date you looked)
  2. This site's current state and the evidence pages
  3. Your requirement · current state · evidence · gap table
  4. Your presentation summary (surprising result, important limit, suggestion)
  5. Your mentor's feedback